New Court Decision April 30, 2024
June 3, 2024
May 2, 2024
VoIP-Pal Receives a Favorable Ruling in the Northern District of Texas
March 18, 2024
VoIP-Pal Announces Three New Special Advisor Appointments
December 4,, 2023
VoIP-Pal Receives Favorable Ruling in Court in the Case Against Locksmith
November 20, 2023
VoIP-Pal Has Successfully Defeated An Ex Parte Reexamination Challenge Against the ’606 Patent
November 1, 2023
VoIP-Pal.com Inc. Receives Two New Patent Grants in India
October 5, 2023
VoIP-Pal Receives Another Favorable IPR Decision from the USPTO
August 1, 2023
VoIP-Pal Receives Favorable IPR Institution Decisions
July 11, 2023
VoIP-Pal Provides an Update on Recent Developments in Its Patent Litigation
LEGAL ACTION - RECENT FILINGS
IPR- FInal Decsion Instituion Denied Google IPR 2022-01075
IPR- FInal Decsion Instituion Denied Google IPR 2022-01073
Lifting of Stay and Scheduling Order
Order Denying Writ of Mandamus Filed by Voip-Pal
Voip-Pal Reply to Writ of Mandamus Response of Apple, AT&T, et al.
Writ of Mandamus Response of Apple, AT&T & Verizon
Voip-Pal Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Voip-Pal Petition for en banc Rehearing (Case No. 5:20-cv-02460)
Order by Judge Koh denying Motion to Dismiss (Case No. 5:20-cv-02460)
Voip-Pal.com Inc. v. Apple Inc. (Case No. 6:20-cv-00275)
Voip-Pal.com Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (Case No. 6:20-cv-00272)
Voip-Pal.com Inc. v. Google, LLC (Case No. 6:20-cv-00269)
Voip-Pal.com Inc. v. Facebook, Inc. (Case No. 6:20-cv-00267)
Transcript of Proceedings Before Judge Lucy Koh (November 14, 2018)
PTAB Final Decision - Institution Denied IPR2019-01003
PTAB Final Decision - Institution Denied IPR2019-01006
PTAB Final Decision - Institution Denied IPR2019-01008
PTAB Final Decision - Institution Denied IPR2019-01009
Amicus Brief in Support of Voip-Pal Appeal (July 16, 2019)
Voip-Pal Final Initial Appeal Brief (June 25, 2019)
Voip-Pal Final Amended Opposition (June 19, 2019)
PTAB Final Decision - Apple Rehearing (May '19)
PTAB Decision - Apple Motion for Sanctions (Dec '18)
Voip-Pal Response to Apple Motion For Sanctions
PTAB Final Written Decision - Apple, Inc. ('815)
PTAB Final Written Decision - Apple, Inc. ('005)
PTAB Decision Denying Institution - AT&T ('815)
PTAB Decision Denying Institution - AT&T ('005)
PTAB Decision Denying Institution - AT&T ('005)
PTAB Decision Denying Institution - Apple ('815)
PTAB Decision Denying Institution - Apple ('005)
Voip-Pal Response - Apple, Inc. ('815)
Voip-Pal Response - Apple, Inc. ('005)
Voip-Pal Response - AT&T ('815)
Voip-Pal Response - AT&T ('005)
Voip-Pal Response - AT&T ('005 Part 2)
Voip-Pal Response - Apple, Inc. ('815)
Voip-Pal Response - Apple, Inc. ('005)
Voip-Pal Request for Rehearing - Apple, Inc. ('815)
Voip-Pal Request for Rehearing - Apple, Inc. ('005)
PTAB Decision to Institute IPR - Apple, Inc. ('815)
PTAB Decision to Institute IPR - Apple, Inc. ('005)
PTAB Decision to Deny IPR - Unified Patents, Inc.
Voip-Pal Preliminary Response (& Exhibit) - Unified Patents, Inc.
Voip-Pal Preliminary Response (& Exhibit) - Apple, Inc. ('815)
Voip-Pal Preliminary Response (& Exhibit) - Apple, Inc. ('005)
Voip-Pal Q&A Document Regarding Recent Legal Action (PDF)
Voip-Pal.com Inc. v. Twitter, Inc. (Case No. 2:16-CV-02338)
Complaint
Table of Exhibits
Complaint (Exhibit A) Patent No. 8,542,815
Complaint (Exhibit B) Patent No. 9,179,005
Complaint (Exhibit C) Twitter Notice Letter
Complaint (Exhibit D) Asserted Claims
Complaint (Exhibit D) Chart 1
Complaint (Exhibit D) Chart 2
Complaint (Exhibit E) VPLM Active Patents
Complaint (Exhibit F) Monetization Analysis
Voip-Pal.com Inc. v. Apple, Inc. (Case No. 2:16-CV-00260)
Complaint
Table of Exhibits
Complaint (Exhibit A) Patent No. 8,542,815
Complaint (Exhibit B) Patent No. 9,179,005
Complaint (Exhibit C) Apple Correspondence
Complaint (Exhibit D) Asserted Claims
Complaint (Exhibit D) Chart 1
Complaint (Exhibit D) Chart 2
Complaint (Exhibit D) Chart 3
Complaint (Exhibit D) Chart 4
Complaint (Exhibit E) Voip-Pal Active Patents
Complaint (Exhibit F) Monetization Analysis
Complaint (Addendum 1 to Exhibit F) Monetization Analysis
Voip-Pal.com Inc. v. Verizon and AT&T (Case No. 2:16-CV-00271)
Complaint
Table of Exhibits
Complaint (Exhibit A) Patent No. 8,542,815
Complaint (Exhibit B) Patent No. 9,179,005
Complaint (Exhibit C) Verizon Communications
Complaint (Exhibit D) AT&T Communications
Complaint (Exhibit E) Asserted Claims Verizon
Complaint (Exhibit E) Chart 1
Complaint (Exhibit E) Chart 2
Complaint (Exhibit E) Chart 3
Complaint (Exhibit E) Chart 4
Complaint (Exhibit E) Chart 5
Complaint (Exhibit E) Chart 6
Complaint (Exhibit F) Asserted Claims AT&T
Complaint (Exhibit F) Chart 1
Complaint (Exhibit F) Chart 2
Complaint (Exhibit F) Chart 3
Complaint (Exhibit F) Chart 4
Complaint (Exhibit F) Chart 5
Complaint (Exhibit F) Chart 6
Complaint (Exhibit G) Voip-Pal Active Patents
Complaint (Exhibit H) Monetization Analysis
Complaint (Addendum 1 to Exhibit H) Monetization Analysis